Students’ conceptual, representational, and analytical difficulties in balancing chemical equations: A thematic analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59965/ijmsed.v4i1.267Abstract
Balancing chemical equations (BCE) is foundational to chemistry learning, yet Nigerian secondary students persistently underperform on this skill. A companion quantitative survey drawn from the same population (Ogundiji, 2024) documented the prevalence of specific difficulties, for example that 96.56% of students could not correctly identify the limiting reagent and 79.3% could not determine atomicity, but its descriptive design could not explain the cognitive roots underlying these figures. The present study extends that work by qualitatively diagnosing why senior secondary students struggle with BCE, using a thematic-analysis design grounded in Braun and Clarke’s (2006) six-phase framework. From the same population of 188 Senior Secondary II students across six public schools in Ibadan, Nigeria, ten students representing the 95th and 5th score percentiles on a validated 10-item Chemical Equation Diagnostic Test were purposively selected for in-depth response analysis. Thematic coding, verified through inter-rater agreement (Cohen’s kappa = 0.70), generated three overarching themes: Conceptual Difficulties (seven codes, including limiting-reagent and valency misconceptions), Representational/Symbolic Difficulties (three codes, including subscript-coefficient confusion), and Analytical/Stoichiometric Reasoning Difficulties. Findings show that students’ errors were not merely procedural slips but reflected weak understanding of conservation of mass, chemical notation, and mole-ratio reasoning, patterns evident among both high- and low-scoring students. By moving beyond prevalence data to explain the reasoning behind each error type, this study contributes the first structured thematic error taxonomy for BCE in the Nigerian context, offering chemistry teachers a diagnostic framework for targeted remediation rather than generic reteaching.
References
Ababio, O. Y. (2021). New school chemistry for senior secondary schools. Africana First Publishers.
Abugu, M. N., & Njoku, Z. C. (2023). Effect of inquiry-based teaching on senior secondary students’ achievement in writing and balancing chemical equations. Journal of Science Teachers Association of Nigeria, 58(1), 45-58.
Akesson, E. (2024). Translating between representational levels in chemistry: Students’ errors in symbolic-to-submicroscopic reasoning. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 25(2), 310-325. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3RP00256J
Amos, A. M. (2017). Revamping the poor quality academic achievement of secondary school students in science: The pivotal role of West African Examination Council from a Nigerian perspective. In Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Conference of the Association for Encouraging Qualitative Understanding of Mathematics and Science (pp. 31-37).
Baah, R., & Ampiah, J. G. (2012). Senior high school students’ understanding and difficulties with chemical equations. International Journal of Science and Technology Education Research, 3(1), 20-27.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Brown, T. L., LeMay, H. E., Bursten, B. E., Murphy, C. J., & Woodward, P. M. (2018). Chemistry: The central science (14th ed.). Pearson.
Cai, S. (2022). Harry Potter themed digital escape room for addressing misconceptions in stoichiometry. Journal of Chemical Education, 99(7), 2747-2753. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c00178
Chibuye, B. (2019). Effect of using algebraic method on secondary school students’ performance in balancing chemical equations in chemistry. Journal of Education and Practice, 10(23), 60-66. https://doi.org/10.7176/JEP/10-23-08
Delena, R., & Marasigan, A. C. (2023). Understanding students’ misconceptions about chemical formula writing and naming ionic compounds. International Journal of Academic Studies in Technology and Education, 1(2), 156-173. https://doi.org/10.55549/ijaste.15
Edelsztein, V. (2023). An experimental approach with a twist: Helping high school students to understand the concept of limiting reactant. Journal of Chemical Education, 100(4), 1505-1510. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c00986
Ekere, M. U. (2014). Analysis and classification of students’ learning difficulties in the writing and balancing of chemical equations (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Nigeria, Nsukka.
Gabel, D. (2019). Learning and teaching chemistry: Research and practice. Springer.
Hamerska, L., Matecha, T., Tothova, M., & Rusek, M. (2024). Between symbols and particles: Investigating the complexity of learning chemical equations. Education Sciences, 14(6), Article 570. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14060570
Johnstone, A. H. (1991). Why is science difficult to learn? Things are seldom what they seem. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 7(2), 75-83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.1991.tb00230.x
Johnstone, A. H. (2000). Teaching of chemistry - logical or psychological? Chemistry Education: Research and Practice, 1(1), 9-15. https://doi.org/10.1039/A9RP90001B
Jusniar, Hartono, Y., & Wibowo, A. (2019). The misconception of stoichiometry and its impact on chemical equilibrium. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1233, 012074. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1233/1/012074
Khandagale, V. S. (2021). Investigation of misconceptions for valency and chemical bonding among high school students (ERIC Document No. ED614892). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED614892.pdf
Kind, V., & Osborne, J. (2017). Student learning in science: Misconceptions and conceptual change. Routledge.
McHugh, M. L. (2012). Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic. Biochemia Medica, 22(3), 276-282. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2012.031
Mind Matters Pedagogy. (2021). 4 mistakes students make when learning to balance equations and how you can address them. https://www.mindmatterspedagogy.com/post/4-mistakes-students-make-when-learning-to-balance-equations-and-how-you-can-address-them
Niaz, M., & Montes, L. (2019). Algorithmic versus conceptual approaches in chemical education: Effects on student understanding. International Journal of Science Education, 41(12), 1650-1672.
Nitereka, F., et al. (2023). Reasons explaining the difficulties of understanding the concepts in the study of general chemistry in Burundi universities. Applied Mathematical Sciences, 17(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.12988/ams.2023.917263
Njoku, Z. C., & Attah, F. O. (2018). Effects of demonstration method and cooperative learning technique on students’ retention in the concept of writing and balancing chemical equations. African Journal of Science, Technology and Mathematics Education, 4(1), 188-195.
Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
Ogundiji, O. (2024). Diagnosis of students’ difficulties in balancing chemical equations in some selected senior secondary schools in Ibadan, Nigeria. Journal of General Education and Humanities, 3(4), 359-368. https://doi.org/10.58421/gehu.v3i4.262
Olatunde, A. (2021). Analysis of students’ difficulties in balancing chemical equations (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Ibadan.
Omari, K. W., & Mandumpal, J. B. (2023). A simple pedagogical limiting reactant kitchenette experiment including a simple algorithm. Chemistry Teacher International, 5(1), 75-81. https://doi.org/10.1515/cti-2022-0028
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). Sage.
Seery, M. K. (2020). A guide to teaching chemistry for the 21st century. CRC Press.
Sileshi, Y. (2011). Chemical reaction: Diagnosis and towards remedy of misconceptions. Academic Journal of Chemical Education, 1(1). https://www.ajol.info/index.php/ajce/article/download/82523/72678/0
Stott, A. E. (2023). Epistemological lessons from inconsistencies in teachers’ errors related to use of the mole ratio in stoichiometry calculations. Journal of Chemical Education, 100(6), 2548-2557. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c01252
Suparman, A. R., Rohaeti, E., & Wening, S. (2024). Student misconception in chemistry: A systematic literature review. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 14(2), 238-252. https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.14.02.28
Taber, K. S. (2018). Chemical misconceptions: Prevention, diagnosis and cure. Royal Society of Chemistry.
Talanquer, V. (2011). Macro, submicro, and symbolic: The many faces of the chemistry triplet. International Journal of Science Education, 33(2), 179-195. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690903386435
Tarkin Celikkiran, A. (2020). Examination of secondary school students’ ability to transform among chemistry representation levels related to stoichiometry. International Journal of Progressive Education, 16(2), 42-55. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2020.241.4
Treichel, P. M., & Kotz, J. C. (2024). Chemical reaction. In Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/science/chemical-reaction
Verangel, G. V., & Prudente, M. S. (2022). Students’ conceptual understanding and confidence on balancing chemical equations using particulate drawings. The Normal Lights, 16(1), 197-221.
West African Examinations Council. (2019). Chief examiner’s report. WAEC Lagos Office.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Olasunkanmi Moses Ogundidj, Mojeed Kolawole Akinsola, Dorcas Olufunke Moronkola, Ayodeji Nathaniel Omilani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
