Exploring early childhood educators’ lived experiences in nurturing young learners’ interests and talents through STEAM-based learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59965/ijmsed.v4i2.326Keywords:
STEAM, Children’s interests and talents, Early childhood educationAbstract
This study explores early childhood education (ECE) teachers’ lived experiences of nurturing children’s interests and talents through STEAM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, and Mathematics) learning. While previous research emphasises child outcomes, curricula, and teacher readiness, teachers’ experiences in resource-constrained settings remain underexplored. Using a descriptive Husserlian phenomenological design, the study involved four Indonesian ECE teachers with at least one year of STEAM implementation experience. Data from semi-structured interviews, classroom observations, and supporting documents were analysed using Colaizzi’s seven-step method. Four themes captured the essence of teachers’ experiences: recognising routine play-based activities as STEAM; innovating with everyday and recycled materials despite resource constraints; shifting toward child-centred inquiry, positioning children as “little researchers”; and becoming facilitators who use open-ended questions and treat mistakes as learning opportunities. Across these themes, teachers described children’s curiosity and preferred forms of expression as starting points for nurturing interests and emerging talents. Limited formal training and resources remained challenges. The findings provide an experiential account of how STEAM reshapes teachers’ professional understanding and practice, without establishing measured improvements in children’s talents. Sustained professional development, teacher learning communities, and institutional support are recommended to strengthen context-sensitive STEAM implementation and help teachers recognise and nurture children’s diverse interests and emerging talents.
References
Acar, O. A., Tarakci, M., & van Knippenberg, D. (2019). Creativity and innovation under constraints: A cross-disciplinary integrative review. Journal of Management, 45(1), 96–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206318805832
Bagiati, A., Yoon, S. Y., Evangelou, D., & Ngambeki, I. (2010). Engineering curricula in early education: Describing the landscape of open resources. Early Childhood Research & Practice, 12(2).
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman.
Belbase, S., Mainali, B. R., Kasemsukpipat, W., Tairab, H., Gochoo, M., & Jarrah, A. (2022). At the dawn of science, technology, engineering, arts, and mathematics (STEAM) education: prospects, priorities, processes, and problems. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 53(11), 2919-2955. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2021.1922943
Brenneman, K., Lange, A., & Nayfeld, I. (2019). Integrating STEM into preschool education: Designing a professional development model in diverse settings. Early Childhood Education Journal, 47(1), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-018-0912-z
Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2016). Math, science, and technology in the preschool classroom. The Future of Children, 26(2), 75–94.
Colaizzi, P. F. (1978). Psychological research as the phenomenologist views it. In R. Valle & M. King (Eds.), Existential phenomenological alternatives for psychology (pp. 48-71). Oxford University Press.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Gagné, F. (2004). Transforming gifts into talents: The DMGT as a developmental theory. High Ability Studies, 15(2), 119–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359813042000314682
Giorgi, A. (2009). The descriptive phenomenological method in psychology: A modified Husserlian approach. Duquesne University Press.
Hatano, G., & Inagaki, K. (1986). Two courses of expertise. In H. Stevenson, H. Azuma, & K. Hakuta (Eds.), Child development and education in Japan (pp. 262–272). W. H. Freeman.
Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.
Lipman, M. (2003). Thinking in education (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Malterud, K., Siersma, V. D., & Guassora, A. D. (2016). Sample size in qualitative interview studies: Guided by information power. Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1753–1760. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315617444
McClure, E. R., Guernsey, L., Clements, D. H., Bales, S. N., Nichols, J., Kendall-Taylor, N., & Levine, M. H. (2017). STEM starts early: Grounding science, technology, engineering, and math education in early childhood. Joan Ganz Cooney Center.
Mejias, S., Thompson, N., Sedas, R. M., Rosin, M., Soep, E., Peppler, K., Roche, J., Wong, J., Hurley, M., Bell, P., & Bevan, B. (2021). The trouble with STEAM and why we use it anyway. Science Education, 105(2), 209–231. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21605
Morrow, R., Rodriguez, A., & King, N. (2015). Colaizzi’s descriptive phenomenological method. The Psychologist, 28(8), 643–644.
Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Sage Publications.
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford University Press.
Park, M.-H., Dimitrov, D. M., Patterson, L. G., & Park, D.-Y. (2017). Early childhood teachers’ beliefs about readiness for teaching science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 15(3), 275–291. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476718X15614040
Perignat, E., & Katz-Buonincontro, J. (2019). STEAM in practice and research: An integrative literature review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 31, 31–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.10.002
Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.
Sullivan, A., & Bers, M. U. (2019). Computer science education in early childhood: The case of ScratchJr. Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice, 18, 113-138.
Tufford, L., & Newman, P. (2012). Bracketing in qualitative research. Qualitative Social Work, 11(1), 80–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325010368316
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Wan, Z. H., Jiang, Y., & Zhan, Y. (2021). STEM education in early childhood: A review of empirical studies. Early Education and Development, 32(7), 940–962. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2020.1814986
Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x
Yakman, G. (2008). STEAM education: An overview of creating a model of integrative education. Pupils' Attitudes Towards Technology (PATT-19) Conference.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Riska Juniar Suprihatin

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

