Social arithmetics: learning from Indramayu traditional market traders in doing calculations

https://doi.org/10.59965/ijmsed.v1i1.25

Authors

  • Sudirman Sudirman Universitas Wiralodra
  • Camilo Andrés Rodríguez-Nieto University of the Coast, Colombia
  • Ebenezer Bonyah Akenten Appiah-Menka University of Skills Training and Entrepreneurial Development
  • Sereima Takiveikata Fiji National University
  • Jenisus O. Dejarlo University of Rizal System

Keywords:

counting methods, social arithmetic, traditional traders

Abstract

This study aims to reveal the counting patterns performed by Indramayu Traditional Market Traders in buying and selling activities. This research uses a qualitative approach with a descriptive case study design. The sampling technique used was purposive sampling by collecting data using snowball sampling. The participants involved in this study were three traders. Data analysis in this study used qualitative analysis from Milles & Huberman, which consisted of 4 stages: data collection, data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion. The results of this study indicate that Indramayu traditional market traders have used mathematical concepts such as addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division operations in buying and selling activities. Besides that, this study also found that traditional traders use backward calculations (from front to back) in buying and selling their wares. The calculation method traditional trader’s use differs from that usually taught in schools. This method has become a standard pattern to make it easier for them to count. Based on these findings it implies that there are other ways of operating information activities that can be used by schools formally. In addition, teachers must be able to provide the context in everyday life, especially in buying and selling activities in traditional markets, to students so that students get a broader understanding of solving problems in arithmetic material.

 

References

Boaler, J. (1993). The role of contexts in the mathematics classroom: do they make mathematics more "real"?. For the learning of mathematics, 13(2), 12-17. https://flm-journal.org/Articles/5456B6E86646C379524F75BCA9D7EE.pdf

Burgin, M., & Czachor, M. (2021). Non-diophantine arithmetics in mathematics, physics and psychology. Introduction: Operation with Numbers as a Base of the Contemporary Culture. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789811214318_0001

Carraher, T. N., Carraher, D. W., & Schliemann, A. D. (1985). Mathematics in the streets and in schools. British journal of developmental psychology, 3(1), 21-29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-835X.1985.tb00951.x

Emzir. 2016. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif Analisis Data. Jakarta. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Fauzan, Armiati & Ceria. 2018. A learning trajectory for teaching social arithmetic using rme approach. IOP,Series. 335: 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/335/1/012121

Fitra, D. (2018). Penerapan pendidikan matematika realistik indonesia (PMRI) dalam pembelajaran matematika. Jurnal Inovasi Edukasi, 1(1), 1-7. ttps://doi.org/10.35141/jie.v1i1.524

Fitriyashari, A. (2014). Analisis kebutuhan perbekalan kapal penangkap ikan di Pelabuhan Perikanan Pantai Tasikang, Rembang. Journal of Fisheries Resources Utilization Management and Technology, 3 (3), 122-130. https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/jfrumt/article/view/5489/5278

Hardi, N., & Irzani, I. (2012). Praktek konsep-konsep matematika dasar dalam kegiatan jual beli di pasar. Beta: Jurnal Tadris Matematika, 5(2), 166-192.

Irpan, S. (2015). Praktek konsep-konsep matematika dasar dalam kegiatan jual beli di Pasar Gunungsari Lombok Barat. Beta: Jurnal Tadris Matematika, 8(2), 193-222.

Kurniasi, R., Prabawanto, S., & Dasari, D. (2022, December). Students’ learning obstacle in the topic of social arithmetic. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2468, No. 1, p. 070017). AIP Publishing LLC. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0102463

Rahayu, W., Prahmana, R. C. I., & Istiandaru, A. (2021). The innovative learning of social arithmetic using realistic mathematics education approach. Jurnal Elemen, 7(1), 29-57. https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v7i1.2676

Slavit, D. (1998). The role of operation sense in transitions from arithmetic to algebraic thought. Educational studies in mathematics, 37(3), 251-274. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003602322232

Sunzuma, G., Zezekwa, N., Gwizangwe, I., & Zinyeka, G. (2021). A comparison of the effectiveness of ethnomathematics and traditional lecture approaches in teaching consumer arithmetic: learners' achievement and teachers' views. Pedagogical Research, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/11215

Suprayo, T. (2018). Studi etnomatematika masyarakat Petani Kabupaten Cirebon. Prosiding SNMPM II, Prodi Pendidikan Matematika, Unswagati, Cirebon, 49-54.

Sutami, W, D. 2012. Strategi rasional pedagang pasar Tradisional. BioKultur. Vol. 1 (2): 127-148. http://journal.unair.ac.id/filerPDF/03%20Wahyu%20Dwi%20S---Strategi%20pedagang%20pasar%20tradisional.pdf

Tyumeneva, Y. A., Larina, G., Alexandrova, E., DeWolf, M., Bassok, M., & Holyoak, K. J. (2018). Semantic alignment across whole-number arithmetic and rational numbers: Evidence from a Russian perspective. Thinking & Reasoning, 24(2), 198-220.

Wibawa, K. A., Payadnya, I., Yasa, I., & Prahmana, R. C. I. (2022). The Learning Trajectory of Entrepreneurship Arithmetic Content Using a Traditional Market. Mathematics Teaching Research Journal, 14(3), 144-169.

Published

01-06-2023

How to Cite

Sudirman, S., Rodríguez-Nieto, C. A., Bonyah, E., Takiveikata, S., & Dejarlo, J. O. . (2023). Social arithmetics: learning from Indramayu traditional market traders in doing calculations . International Journal of Mathematics and Sciences Education, 1(1), 41–49. https://doi.org/10.59965/ijmsed.v1i1.25

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)